Article creator image

BY Fairygodboss

The Secret to $2 TRILLION More Dollars

Map of Women's Labor Force Participation and GDP

Photo credit: McKinsey Global Institute

TAGS: McKinsey, Gender equality, Women in the workplace, Economics

Most people know that women make up roughly half of the population and workforce but what’s reported less often is the exact mix of jobs that women have. 

Last week, a McKinsey study was released showing that women in the United States are responsible for 42% of full-time jobs and 64% of part-time jobs. In other words, women are more likely to work part-time jobs than men, which means the pay they take home will be correspondingly lower. Moreover, women also tend to work in sectors where economic output (i.e. gross domestic product, or GDP) per worker is lower than men. For example, women disproportionately work in low GDP-per-worker sectors such as health-care services and education, as compared to men. (This mix of part-time vs. full-time work as well as the industries women work in are also one of the main reasons behind the gender pay gap statistic, i.e. the oft-cited fact that women earn on average, 76% of what men, on average, earn.)

McKinsey’s study on gender equality makes the case that somewhere between $2-4 trillion in GDP (representing a 10-20% increase) could potentially be added to the American economy by 2025 if we tackled gender inequality. Their GDP projections essentially assume that 3 things happen:

  1. More women participate in the workforce;
  2. More women work full-time as opposed to part-time; and
  3. A higher percentage of women work in higher GDP-per-worker sectors than they currently do.

The reason for the wide range of economic projections in McKinsey’s analysis is that they make different assumptions for what it takes to get to these larger economic targets. The $2 trillion (10% increase) figure assumes that all U.S. states match the rate of gender equality in the fastest-improving large states (e.g. New York) over the past decade on a bunch of different metrics (more on this below). The $4 trillion figure, on the other hand, represents an assumption that more jobs would be created than the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics currently estimates will be available by 2025 and that those jobs come from high-GDP productivity sectors such as professional and business services, information and manufacturing.

Getting more women to participate full-time in the labor force in the highest-productivity sectors obviously doesn’t just automatically happen without larger changes in the world. Therefore McKinsey’s analysis discusses the pre-requisite conditions of gender equality in society before we can hope to reach those outcomes. Specifically, they focus on 10 different indicators where improvement would translate into higher and more remunerative economic workforce participation for women (and thus economic results for all):

 

  1. Male/female ratio in the labor-force participation rate
  2. Male/female ratio in professional and technical jobs
  3. Male/female ratio in leadership and managerial positions
  4. Male/female ratio in unpaid care work
  5. Percentage of families with children that are led by single mothers
  6. Rate of maternal mortality
  7. Male/female ratio in higher education
  8. Rate of teenage pregnancy
  9. Male/female ratio in political representation
  10. Rate of violence against women


Clearly we believe that gender equality and improvements in these 10 areas is the right thing to do. We also know that some of us need more than a moral argument to believe there should be improvements in gender equality. What McKinsey has set out to do is to show that there’s an economic and business case for gender equality in society and the workplace, and that improving the lot of women generates a very big number: $2 trillion dollars, to be exact.

Fairygodboss

Fairygodboss is committed to improving the workplace and lives of women. 
Join us by reviewing your employer!

Related Community Discussions

  • Hello everyone. I'm trying to attend more tech conferences in 2017 but my budget just doesn't allow for a lot of it. Every event seems to cost a lot and I'd love to attend more. Does anyone have any suggestions or ideas for what conferences to attend that are more cost-effective as well as how to get discounted tickets anywhere?

  • I believe that the common day to day issues of sexism (too small to call people out on) wear women down more than the big problems. I've also seen men (who were previously oblivious) become great advocates for women when these situations were pointed out to them.

    I am working on a virtual reality program, which share some of the common problems women run across, training the mind to recognize the problem. I'm looking for some of the common issues people run across. Personal experiences, research you've read, anything would be greatly appreciated! Either reply, or email: info@socialQVR.com

    VR has a huge potential for remapping neural training, and I want to make sure I'm drawing from the wealth of communal knowledge, not just my own experience.

  • How do I get a job at Apple? Every time I apply to a position I feel like my resume disappears in the "cloud".

  • I work in a small company with 43 employees. I supervise a team of 3, our section is responsible for conducting testing on components used in consumer products. A few months ago it came to my attention that one of them was falsifying test reports. I notified my boss and a meeting was scheduled with the employee, rep of her choice, my boss, HR person and myself.

    At the meeting the employee opted to bring a friend from another department. I attempted to provide a summary of the matter when asked by my boss. I say attempt because I was continuously interrupted by the "friend" and the employee with comments that I was jealous of the employee, stupid and that they were tired/bored listening to my attempts to present the summary. My boss and HR stayed silent during all of this.

    After the meeting my boss and HR person said they would deliberate. A week later I was informed that no action would be taken against the employee. I have multiple issues now.

    I feel like the work I am doing has no meaning if someone can get away with falsifying reports (I know it is not rocket science but I don't consider ensuring consumers get quality products to be nothing). The employee and her friend giggle in my presence and make reference to her "getting away with it", I really want nothing to do with her anymore but am still her supervisor. My boss tells me that he does not have confidence in the employee's capabilities and would like me to "get her up to scratch", this is the same employee that stated how stupid I was. So while I had to train her for the position and evaluate her performance I am too stupid at some points (disciplinary role) but am suddenly competent when it comes to getting her up to scratch. I feel used by my boss and get really upset when this employee asks me for help (if I am so stupid, she should not need my help).

    Finally I feel very disillusioned by my boss and the HR rep who at no time attempted to bring order to the proceedings. When I voiced this disappointment to my boss he advised me that he was "sorry" but that these sort of things get nasty. He said if such an incident arose in the future he would do better but in the mean time I need to get over it.

    I now supervise an employee I don't trust and a boss for whom I no longer have any respect. My boss says he wants more comraderie in my section (but I just don't see how I can have a positive relationship with this employee).

    Any advice.? Am I overacting like my boss says? Do I just need to buck up and get over this? How do I deal with these issues with the employee and my boss?

  • Hi, I am starting a new job shortly as Head of Marketing for a tech company. The logical part of my brain knows that they believe I can do the job or they wouldn't have made the offer but another part of me is gripped by imposter syndrome and feel out of my depth. Do any of you have some advice on how to overcome imposter syndrome?

Find Out

What are women saying about your company?

Click Here

Share This

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Share with Friends
  • Share Anonymously

The Secret to $2 TRILLION More Dollars

The Secret to $2 TRILLION More Dollars

Most people know that women make up roughly half of the population and workforce but what’s reported less often is the exact mix of jobs that women ...

Most people know that women make up roughly half of the population and workforce but what’s reported less often is the exact mix of jobs that women have. 

Last week, a McKinsey study was released showing that women in the United States are responsible for 42% of full-time jobs and 64% of part-time jobs. In other words, women are more likely to work part-time jobs than men, which means the pay they take home will be correspondingly lower. Moreover, women also tend to work in sectors where economic output (i.e. gross domestic product, or GDP) per worker is lower than men. For example, women disproportionately work in low GDP-per-worker sectors such as health-care services and education, as compared to men. (This mix of part-time vs. full-time work as well as the industries women work in are also one of the main reasons behind the gender pay gap statistic, i.e. the oft-cited fact that women earn on average, 76% of what men, on average, earn.)

McKinsey’s study on gender equality makes the case that somewhere between $2-4 trillion in GDP (representing a 10-20% increase) could potentially be added to the American economy by 2025 if we tackled gender inequality. Their GDP projections essentially assume that 3 things happen:

  1. More women participate in the workforce;
  2. More women work full-time as opposed to part-time; and
  3. A higher percentage of women work in higher GDP-per-worker sectors than they currently do.

The reason for the wide range of economic projections in McKinsey’s analysis is that they make different assumptions for what it takes to get to these larger economic targets. The $2 trillion (10% increase) figure assumes that all U.S. states match the rate of gender equality in the fastest-improving large states (e.g. New York) over the past decade on a bunch of different metrics (more on this below). The $4 trillion figure, on the other hand, represents an assumption that more jobs would be created than the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics currently estimates will be available by 2025 and that those jobs come from high-GDP productivity sectors such as professional and business services, information and manufacturing.

Getting more women to participate full-time in the labor force in the highest-productivity sectors obviously doesn’t just automatically happen without larger changes in the world. Therefore McKinsey’s analysis discusses the pre-requisite conditions of gender equality in society before we can hope to reach those outcomes. Specifically, they focus on 10 different indicators where improvement would translate into higher and more remunerative economic workforce participation for women (and thus economic results for all):

 

  1. Male/female ratio in the labor-force participation rate
  2. Male/female ratio in professional and technical jobs
  3. Male/female ratio in leadership and managerial positions
  4. Male/female ratio in unpaid care work
  5. Percentage of families with children that are led by single mothers
  6. Rate of maternal mortality
  7. Male/female ratio in higher education
  8. Rate of teenage pregnancy
  9. Male/female ratio in political representation
  10. Rate of violence against women


Clearly we believe that gender equality and improvements in these 10 areas is the right thing to do. We also know that some of us need more than a moral argument to believe there should be improvements in gender equality. What McKinsey has set out to do is to show that there’s an economic and business case for gender equality in society and the workplace, and that improving the lot of women generates a very big number: $2 trillion dollars, to be exact.

Fairygodboss

Fairygodboss is committed to improving the workplace and lives of women. 
Join us by reviewing your employer!

thumbnail 1 summary