Meghan Markle is always making headlines. I mean, as a beautiful actress turned duchess with a killer wardrobe who’s married to one of the most beloved princes of all time, she basically writes the headlines herself. But since she announced her pregnancy in October, the headlines haven’t been too kind. Instead, they’ve revealed a huge issue with the way we’re addressing Meghan’s pregnancy.
In fact, according to the Office of National Statistics, over half of all babies born in the UK are born to mothers over 30. And in the US, the number of first births from women 35 and older grew by 23% between 2000 and 2014. Research ties this shift to more women entering the workforce and prioritizing their careers, more women pursuing higher education, and more financial security generally.
It’s the label they use in headlines, social media posts, and snarky copy calling out the Duchess’s age. Sure, “geriatric pregnancy” was once a medical term to describe pregnancy in women over 35. But it’s now been largely abandoned by the medical community due to its outdated (and messed up) connotations. You know, kind of like we’ve retired the once-common labels of “old maid” or “spinster” (I hope) as women are getting married later and later.
Yes, having a child over 35 does carry certain risks. However, many women in this age group have perfectly healthy pregnancies and babies. Other factors — like access to prenatal care or racial biases — can have just as much or more of an impact on healthy pregnancies.
But you’d also think we’ve progressed to the point where women could go to work without being harassed, and we haven't so... I guess I'll check in with you all in 10 to 20 years.