Quantcast
Is The Gender Pay Gap Now Legal? | Fairygodboss
Mystery Woman
Tell us more for better jobs, advice
and connections
Don’t miss out on new opportunities.
YOUR TOPICS
Your feed isn’t personalized yet. Follow topics like career advice, lifestyle or health.
YOUR GROUPS
Discover and join groups with like-minded women who share your interests, profession, and lifestyle.
COMPANIES YOU FOLLOW
Get alerted when there are new employee reviews.
YOUR JOB ALERTS
Get notified when new jobs are posted.
Editorial
It May Now Be Legal To Pay Women Less Than Men If This One Thing Is True
pbogdanov / Adobe Stock
Georgene Huang
star-svg
10
Comment

Here’s an important equal pay update for all you ladies paying close attention to your wallet.

Last week, a federal appeals court ruled (unanimously, no less) that it was perfectly legal to pay employees doing the same job differently, based on their prior salary history — even if that results in a woman being paid less than a man for equal work. In other words, if you’re an employer using salary history as your guide for doling out salaries, there is no violation of equal pay laws if you pay a man and woman differently for the same job.

The gender pay gap is somewhat controversial precisely because people often wonder if it’s okay to pay people differently for equal or similar work due to differences in experience or education. What if the difference is simply your salary history? A bad pay negotiation or gender discrimination in the past can cause your salary to be lower than a man who takes the same job. That is the issue at the heart of this case, Rizio vs. Fresno County Office of Education.

According to Above the Law, the plaintiff in this case was Aileen Rizo, a math consultant in Fresno, California. They gave her a raise (five percent is the policy by the County Office of Education), which brought her salary to $62,733. Rizio filed the case after she found out a man was hired for the same position as hers and had a salary of $79,000.

So why did the judges say Fresno County’s pay policy was not discriminatory? In the judge’s own words:

“First... the policy includes no subjective opinions; it encourages candidates to leave current jobs to work for the county because they receive an automatic five percent pay raise above their current salaries; the policy prevents favoritism because it ensures consistency in application; and the policy is a judicious use of taxpayer dollars.”

Rizio told The San Francisco Chronicle, “When you see injustice, you have to make a change. I don't want the end of the road for my daughters to be sitting next to a man who makes more than they do just because of the figure he was making at a past job."

This ruling is probably very disappointing to anyone who has negotiated less than perfectly in the past and who thinks that people should be paid the same amounts for equal job descriptions. Helping to stop the perpetration of gender bias’ impact on the gender pay gap is one of the reasons that some states and cities have recently banned questions about your salary history.

In response, Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton of Washington D.C. introduced a federal ban on salary history questions on Tuesday, saying the California court's ruling illustrated why a federal law is needed. We’ll now have to see whether Congress agrees with the federal court ruling and passes a national law to ensure equal pay for equal work.

 

Fairygodboss

Fairygodboss is committed to improving the workplace and lives of women. 
Join us by reviewing your employer!

Comment
No Comments Yet

Looking for a new job?

Our employer partners are actively recruiting women! Update your profile today.

tag with leaves
girl-one-image
The Fairygodboss Feed
We're a community of women sharing advice and asking questions
background-svggirl-two-image
Start a Post
Share your thoughts (even anonymously)...