icon
Home icon

Home

Jobs icon

Jobs

Reviews icon

Reviews

Network icon

Network

Resources icon

Resources

|For Employers icon

For Employers

logo
about
careers
FAQs
privacy policyterms & conditionsfor employers
112k
20k
icon
© 2022 Fairygodboss. All rights reserved.
My ProfileMy MessagesMy NetworkMy SettingsGroupsEventsMy PostsLog Out
Mystery Woman
Tell us more for better jobs, advice
and connections
YOUR GROUPS
Discover and join groups with like-minded women who share your interests, profession, and lifestyle.
COMPANIES YOU FOLLOW
Get alerted when there are new employee reviews.
YOUR JOB ALERTS
Get notified when new jobs are posted.
Your post is published!
Becki Fordham
star-svg
119
Procurement Leader, Six Sigma Black-Belt, CPSM
03/31/20 at 1:35PM UTC
in
Career

Equal Pay for Women? Not all... not me.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/31/business/equal-pay-day-trnd/index.html

Share

Join the conversation...
JENN O'TOOL
star-svg
99
Leadership and Career Transformation Coach
03/31/20 at 6:11PM UTC
As an HR leader who has done a significant amount of hiring over the years, I have experienced virtually no intentional effort to bring in women at lower salaries than men. However, what I DO see often is that female candidates with equivalent experience to male candidates often present lower salary expectations than male candidates. Here's a situation specific example: Hiring range - 75,000-85,000 Male candidate salary expectations - 85,000 Female candidate salary expectations - 75,000 Equivalent skills, Hiring Manager likes both HMs , who often focus on their budget impact of hires, may see the female candidate with a lower salary expectation as the best choice and know they can make an offer she will accept while saving money in the budget. She gets the job, Manager preserves some $$ in his budget, everyone's happy right? Well for now, until you look at the compensation spread in the department where it turns out that all of the employees with the new female candidate's same skills are paid 85,000 (which the manager would have been willing to pay - need to remember that!). So what you have now is a talented female employee paid 13% lower than her peers - not because she's not as qualified, but because she didn't ask for enough. Had she stated her expected salary as 85,000, now it's a toss up as to who gets selected, but if she is hired she comes in on par with her peers. Coming in 13% below the norm salary is next to impossible to make up with annual merit increases. If someone's salary is "in the range" there will be little to no effort to get some up to the level of the others. In my role I do whatever I can to work with Managers to understand that low-balling offers like this will create perpetual ongoing issues and I advocate for them to pay what they were willing to pay at the top end EVEN IF the candidate asked for less, especially if skills warrant that compared to current employees. But trust me, most HR and Talent Acquisition people won't do this. This applied to all candidates really, but women in particular: --KNOW what you should be paid in general for your job function --Understand the potential pay variations that exist based on industry, size of company, location, etc... --Know how to communicate your expectations in such a way that you are clear about what salary you desire, but are also open to conversation around a the total package and may have some flexibility. On that last point, even if you really don't want to be flexible, if you're not that far off from their cap, you want to be able to stay in the process to see if there's a mutual fit. And if you end up being the top candidate, companies will often try to get you a package that meets your requirements. At that point - you get to decide how flexible you want to be and now have negotiating power. Women can really be their own worst enemies when it comes to asking for what they want. In many cases, they are more comfortable asking for more once they are hired, but that is a much more difficult task that asking for the right salary at the start. A Hiring Manager who may not h
Becki Fordham
star-svg
119
Procurement Leader, Six Sigma Black-Belt, CPSM
03/31/20 at 4:38PM UTC
Even though a base-salary "may be" predetermined, I see offers that differ based on "experience" which can certainly be subjective. Sometimes it is based on who the applicant knows, which is simply ridiculous. Beyond that, your point regarding men being tougher negotiators is a big factor. I certainly fight to keep an even base, then increases are determined purely on performance. Unfortunately, I don't feel that all managers apply this concept across the board.
Becki Fordham
star-svg
119
Procurement Leader, Six Sigma Black-Belt, CPSM
03/31/20 at 2:42PM UTC
I agree with you, in general; however, as a hiring manager who can compare identical fields on gender alone the disparity due to gender is very much still a factor, unfortunately. We are making progress, but we still have a long way to go.
User deleted comment on 03/31/20 at 3:35PM UTC
User deleted comment on 03/31/20 at 2:26PM UTC

You're invited.

See what women are sharing on Fairygodboss.
What's new today
wand-button
Personalize your jobs
Get recommendations for recent and relevant jobs.
Employer Reviews
Weir ESCO
5.0
Weir ESCO is supportive, collaborative, and flexible work...
Twitter
3.7
The people at Twitter are great, super supportive and...
Recent Content
What is Re-Onboarding and is It Necessary in the Return to Work?
Here’s Your Daily Dose of Career Inspiration! 2 Women Share How They Grew Into Global Leaders
4 Phrases Confident Women Tell Themselves When They Don’t Get The Job They Dreamed Of
icon
© 2022 Fairygodboss. All rights reserved.
  • about
  • careers
  • FAQs
  • privacy policy
  • terms & conditions
112k
20k