This practice has nothing to do with LinkedIn or where the job has been posted. In previous companies I've recruited for, it's a policy (and I believe a legal policy) that a job must be posted for 3 days externally before you can extend a written offer, and typically happens if there is already someone identified (a referral or internal candidate) that the hiring managers want to bring on board. The policy's part of the Equal Opportunity Employer law - to allow qualified talent apply & to make the best hiring decision based on looking at more than just 1 pre-determined or possibly internal candidate.
Now, if these companies were to be audited they would have to prove in a business case that 1) they did source through all applications received in those 3 days, 2) that the original person they wanted to offer to, is in fact the best candidate compared to all those applications, and 3) they allowed it to be a competitive process by sourcing & qualifying all those who went through the process.
It can be frustrating to apply to a role just a few days later to be told it has been filled, but my suggestion is to focus on the things you can control - your resume being easy on the recruiter eye, having keywords that match the posting and your true experience, and if given the opportunity to speak to a recruiter sharing your story in the most authentic and value-oriented way to show a clear case as to why you are the best fit.
Share your insight
Join an authentic community that helps women support each other at work. Share your professional experience or ask for advice — you can even post anonymously.
43 Comments
Join the conversation