I live in an at-will state. You are not required to give a reason. You are not required to HAVE a reason. It could be because the moon was full on the 31 of the month of February.
"California Labour Code 2922: An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other. Employment for a specified term means an employment for a period greater than one month." As long as it is not an illegal reason. But, then, unless they are STUPID, they won't admit to it. So, you would have to prove that it was for an illegal reason.
Nothing said about a reason being required. Unless they change the law so a reason IS required.
Dore v Arnold Worldwide, Inc...
1. "At any time"
The Court of Appeal below agreed with Dore that AWI's letter, signed by Dore, was not clear and unambiguous with respect to cause for termination. Notwithstanding the letter's statement that "your employment with Arnold Communications, Inc. is at will," the court reasoned, by going on to define the term "at will" to mean that AWI had the right to terminate Dore's employment "at any time," AWI impliedly relinquished the right to terminate Dore without cause. We disagree.
Dore v. Arnold Worldwide, Inc., 39 Cal.4th 384, 389 (Cal. 2006)
We conclude, in sum, that AWI's letter contained no ambiguity, patent or latent, in its termination provisions. Accordingly, we agree with the trial court that no triable issues of fact exist with respect to Dore's causes of action for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
Dore v. Arnold Worldwide, Inc., 39 Cal.4th 384, 393 (Cal. 2006)
As far as not telling her? I don't understand that, other than perhaps someone just forgot. Of course, on the other hand, a now terminated employee may need to come in anyway to pick up any personal property and termination cheque.
Share your insight
Join an authentic community that helps women support each other at work. Share your professional experience or ask for advice — you can even post anonymously.
78 Comments
Join the conversation