I'm sorry this is happening to you. As a recruiter, I always tried to keep my candidates in the loop even when I didn't have the best or even solid news to share. But just to give you a peak behind the curtain, there is often a lot happening behind the scenes and recruiters are stuck in the middle trying to obtain info on how to move forward.
I have had hiring managers interview a great first candidate but they want to see others to compare/contrast to make sure they aren't making a decision out of desperation. If a role isn't pulling in a lot of applications, we would repost the role.
Or they become aware of a referral from someone on the team and it's common courtesy to also interview that person, which takes time.
Another possibility here (and I hate to say this) - you could be their second choice and they are awaiting a decision from the person they made the offer to. Sometimes the role needs to be reposted for some internal reason related to an offer (i.e. candidate who was offered entered their info wrong in the system and they need to edit or a senior manager who approves offers needs to see the job to align on salary request).
Whoever the recruiter is sounds a bit inexperienced frankly. They may not know exactly what to say to you and instead of saying something, they dig their head in the sand.
It's entirely possible the role was reposted automatically, but there should still be some communication.
I agree with the previous recommendation to send the note again with a firm deadline for a decision.
Good luck!
Share your insight
Join an authentic community that helps women support each other at work. Share your professional experience or ask for advice — you can even post anonymously.
14 Comments
Join the conversation