I haven't posted about this in a while since this site has become such a Hot Mess Express but since you asked, here we go!
I have experience with 9 or 10 different ATS and with different configurations of those systems.
The ATS is basically an electronic filing cabinet that stores resumes, allows recruiters to manage and track candidates through the interview process, schedule interviews, it’s where offer letters are generated.
Here's what happens (on all the systems I've ever used) when a candidate applies to one of my open requisitions:
I click on their name in the list of new applicants for that requisition. Their resume has not been ranked. It has not been sorted for keywords. It has not been "scored". It has not been filtered.
I click "download resume". It downloads in whatever format - Word doc or PDF - the candidate uploaded it. I look at their resume. With my eyeballs. Every one.
There's no need for me to search or sort by keywords - or anything else - for new applicants because you're sitting right there in the list of new applicants.
I know most candidates don't seem to want to hear this, but when you're being rejected, you're being rejected by a human.
I'm the bot.
You wrote "After submitting an application, a lot of third-party vendors Greenhouse and Workable, how do they send and grade candidates and is that info then added to company's ATS system? "
Those third party vendors - Greenhouse, Taleo, iCIMS, Workday, etc. - those are the ATS vendors. Unless a company has a proprietary in-house ATS they developed themselves, companies purchase an ATS from one of those vendors.
You wrote "how do they send"
Nothing gets sent. My company buys Workday for our new ATS - we implement it - you apply in our Workday ATS.
Regarding "grading" or "scoring" - this is sooo rarely used by recruiters. Most companies either don't buy that feature or don't have it turned on. Even if it is turned on, the vast majority of recruiters completely ignore those because the systems are so notoriously bad at it. In a recent survey on LI, 86% of the recruiters who responded said they ignore and scores or rankings.
You wrote "if you're a top applicant on for example LInkedIn are you weeded out to not even receive an interview."
I hate to disappoint anyone but being a "top applicant" on LinkedIn means nothing.
There is no such thing as an "ATS-compliant" or "ATS-friendly" resume no matter how much someone wants to charge you for one. There just isn't.
Please write your resume for the human that will review it.
I know the dimfluencers are out there telling you that y'all are getting rejected by AI and if you just pay them a bucket of money, they'll sell you a resume that will "beat the ATS". None of that is true. There is no "beating the ATS" the goal is to get INTO the ATS so you can be considered as a candidate.
If AI was reviewing and rejecting resumes (it's not because the only AI in my brand spanking new ATS is the scheduler and the little chatbot that pops up to annoy you), why/how would recruiters be able to receive things like tax returns, take out menus, recipes, copies of summons', wills and frighteninly, just tonight, a Substance Abuse Assessment that candidates accidentally attached instead of their resume.
Also, ghosting is, unfortunately, all too common these days. If AI were reviewing and rejecting resumes, you would have a 100% response rate.
Now let's address when a job posting on LinkedIn says "Over 100 people clicked apply" - that does not mean that 100 people actually applied to the position.
That just means that over 100 people CLICKED THROUGH THE JOB POSTING.
Typically just a fraction of the jobseekers actually complete an application. LinkedIIn has no way of knowing whether or not someone completes an application in our ATS. They do not have access to that information.
And of those that do complete an application, roughly 90% are not a fit.
Some recruiter math: 200 people click through the job posting - 50 actually complete an application - 90% of those will not be qualified - now I'm left with 5 potential candidates.
So just because it may have a lot of applicants doesn't mean it had the qualified applicants needed.
You may not be competing with as many people as you think.
If you're qualified, please apply!
Regarding reposting of jobs, if I need to make any change in a job posting - even to move a comma - I have to un-post it, make the change and then re-post it.
For the most part, if my job is still posted - no matter how long it's been open - I still need candidates!
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Share your insight
Join an authentic community that helps women support each other at work. Share your professional experience or ask for advice — you can even post anonymously.
28 Comments
Join the conversation