Suspicious and unprofessional interview process
Anonymous
Suspicious and unprofessional interview process
I need your professional perspectives on what just happened to me and what the next steps for me should be.
I have worked at a large well known institution as a paraprofessional for over 5 years and a manager position just opened up in my department. I’ve been performing interim manager duties part-time along with my administrative para duties for a while now (with compensation, no change in title or benefits) and I figured why not apply for the permanent position. I had my current boss and team’s blessings to pursue this. I researched the job posting duties, gathered evidence of fit compared to what I have been doing all along, then proceeded with the application. Specifically highlighting in the resume and application my leadership experience. I wanted to pursue this position to be fairly compensated for the level of work I complete, grow more as a leader with my institution, and support some big initiatives that my background matches.
First Red Flag - The documents I attached to my application became "suddenly missing" when I reviewed the submission. I followed up with HR to advise them and provide them with the materials. They assure me they are now attached, yet I can not verify this. Regardless, the HR Lady and My Boss determine I am an excellent candidate that is qualified to interview. HR Lady sends me a virtual meeting link and I prepare for over a week .
Second Red Flag - On the day of the first interview , I join the meeting. Five minutes go by and no one is there. I instant message one of the interviewers on the panel to ask what is going on. It turns out they are all waiting for me in a different meeting room. HR Lady had sent me the wrong link! She admits to the mistake and sends me the new correct link through instant messenger. I join at a 10 minute disadvantage. Everyone in the session looks irritated. I feel embarrassed and even more anxious, but I still ace the panel interview in spite of this gaff. I make sure to mention my leadership experiences with narrative examples. I move on to the second round a week later with another panel interview and it all goes well. I am the top candidate and it’s looking promising.
Third Red Flag - HR Lady calls me because suddenly they can't find the "evidence" of my leadership capabilities. I send a follow up memo highlighting specific jobs and roles where I demonstrated leadership on projects, processes, and when leading teams. I also share this wrinkle up the chain so everyone is informed once more that I am interested and have the qualifications. My current boss validates the evidence I provided. HR seemed satisfied.
Fourth Red Flag - All of a sudden on a late Friday, HR Lady contacts me with bad new. She tells me I’m in fact NOT qualified for the position due to a “semantic technicality” that she “failed to screen” and that “I shouldn’t even have been interviewed” so I can't be offered the job. Even though I provided clear evidence of the trait in the application, resume, two panel interviews, and a validated memo. Even though 8 independent interviewers found me qualified. Even though I am currently doing the actual job duties!
I am trying hard to process this rationally even though I feel like I have been lead through a game I was never meant to win. I can't prove discrimination, but a string of concurrent HR gaffs suggests an egregious level of incompetence that warrants question.
I shared my experiences up the command chain and with the hiring committee so everyone is informed of what has just happened. There will be an investigatory follow up meeting in the coming week.
I believe in this organization's mission, but this negative experience has me questioning everything.
Quitting wouldn't be a viable option for me at this time, but its something I am considering for the future.


Share your insight
Join an authentic community that helps women support each other at work. Share your professional experience or ask for advice — you can even post anonymously.
13 Comments
Join the conversation