Bait and switch on salary?

Bait and switch on salary?

I was recently contacted by a third party recruiter to interview for a role I’m highly qualified for at a software company. Before meeting with the company, I reviewed the salary and role requirements in detail with the recruiter.

I’ve now completed multiple rounds of interviews, including a case study, and the company decided to make an offer. The offer is 15% lower than the bottom of the salary band the recruiter provided. It’s not exactly insultingly low, but it’s much lower than I anticipated, and honestly, I would not have gone through the process if I’d known upfront.

I let the recruiter know that the offer wasn’t in line with the salary range communicated up front, and he said he was sorry, but the company has decided to change it at the last minute. He said they realized I would be making more than someone in a higher level role, and they were committed to pay equity. I said that I think changing the salary at the end of the process is highly unethical, and calls the company culture and management into question. After that, he said he would go back and advocate for me.

Has anyone experienced this before? I’m not sure if the salary issue was caused by the recruiter, or if the company genuinely changed their minds last minute. I’m debating reaching out to the hiring manager- partly because they said use this recruiter frequently, and partly because I don’t want to be seen as the jerk who demanded a much higher salary out of the blue.

Why women love us:

  • Daily articles on career topics
  • Jobs at companies dedicated to hiring more women
  • Advice and support from an authentic community
  • Events that help you level up in your career
  • Free membership, always

Share your insight

Join an authentic community that helps women support each other at work. Share your professional experience or ask for advice — you can even post anonymously.

18 Comments

Join the conversation
  1. Anonymous

    I have never experienced this but don’t feel like you are a jerk. You deserve to get your worth and don’t settle less than you deserve.

  2. Maegan M

    You aren't going to be seen as the jerk who demanded it out of the blue because you can legit state that was not the range explained to you at the beginning of the process and X amount is what you require. This is on them, not you.

  3. Sharon Grehan

    Definitely don't settle and don't allow your fear of their perception stop you from articulating your worth. You said you wouldn't have gone through the process if you had known the salary they were going to offer - let that be your reminder. You deserve to be fairly compensated and if they are lowering your offer to offset underpaying current staff that raises many red flags. Be firm and you definitely won't come off as unprofessional and nown of this is out of the blue, you went into this with clear expectations and they are the ones who changed things out of the blue! Best of luck

  4. Breanna

    I should probably clarify- if the recruiter lied to me about the salary upfront, I imagine that from the company perspective it might look like I’m suddenly demanding more money and acting unsatisfied with the salary band at the end of the process.

  5. Anonymous

    Hadn't thought of this possibility. Very complicated! Maybe wait to see what the recruiter says? If they did lie, maybe they're trying to work to undo their lie. But then depending on their response, reach out to the hiring manager just to make sure your side of the story is accurate.

  6. Anonymous

    Extremely common but unprofessional nonetheless.

  7. Michele Sinclair

    Red flag ...

  8. Anonymous

    If you contact the hiring manager, you could write a note indicating you enjoyed learning about the company & position and that you were impressed by the people you met. You were surprised to learn the salary requirements didn’t meet what you had specified with the recruiter in advance, as both their team and you spent a lot of time on the process. You especially had hoped to join the team…. Etc. That would be a soft way of figuring out if the recruiter was dishonest, and if not, then the company itself was caught in a situation that doesn’t speak positively for its culture.

  9. Anonymous

    To maintain pay equity, they can pay a sign-on bonus to you that brings you up to your expected pay rate. I'd also have the offer letter stipulate an increase within 1 year, irrespective of performance. Ensures you are compensated appropriately and gives them the opportunity to address their salary band issue.

  10. Anonymous

    A sign on bonus is great - this year. What about next year and going forward? The base salary will still be too low and the company will have no incentive to adjust it. The other commenters have given excellent advice, I'd go those directions rather than this.

  11. Anonymous

    Something to remember is that, while it feels like recruiters are on the employee’s side, their job is to get company vacancies filled. That’s how they get paid. It’s very possible that the recruiter knew that the pay was too low from the start, but was hoping you’d get through the process and have invested too much time to turn it down. Because, at the end of the day, they are paid by companies not by the people they are placing in jobs. Just keep that in mind while you negotiate this.

    And quite honestly, if the company was willing to pay you XX at the beginning of the process, what someone else makes should not factor into that, at all. If anything, it sounds like the other person needs a raise and you need to be paid your due.

    Stay strong, know your worth!

  12. Lisa Marie

    Changing the salary at the end of the process is a red flag you should not ignore.

    This is NOT a mere company POLICY which is open to change at their discretion.

    How did no one there realize this "disparity" before this stage in the game?

    How will they treat other situations such as this and others in the future? Such as:
    - offer then change the terms or value of bonuses when it comes time to pay out
    - hybrid schedule was never hybrid in the furst place (not just changing to keep up with the job demands)
    - changing other terms of employment after you've started (system of promotion/growth to other levels, provision of systems/tools to carry out the job's functions)
    - etc, etc.

    My bottomline advice: No matter how desperate you are for a job, do not take THIS ONE IF you are a person who commits to staying at least a year or two in a role before moving on, BECAUSE ANY COMPANY which does this sort of thing, most likely has other shenanigans up their sleeve, and CANNOT BE TRUSTED.

    THIS is NOT a little oversight.
    If I were in your position, I would either
    1) politely politely decline stating the last minute change in the salary as my reason
    2) if you are currently unemployed and needing an income, go ahead and start the job (provided there are no caveats), but keep interviewing - and if asked about the current role during interviews, simply refer to the salary "under-cutters" as a transition/temporary role while you are searching for your next best opportunity.

  13. Anonymous

    I agree - had this happen many moons ago and the company behavior played out with commission changes at the time of payout, promotions, etc. We discovered the beloved Director never got approval for her plans yet we had stuff in writing. We should have sued.

  14. Joanna Poe

    Tell them if they're committed to pay equity, they should raise the salary of the more senior employee to match the current demands of the market, not lowball the incoming people. They'll only end up getting what they pay for...

  15. BeaBoss750792

    Yup. This situation screams to me that they’re so reluctant to raise the salary of a current employee to the going market rate that they’d rather lowball a promising prospective employee.

  16. Ida McCarty

    Unfortunately during the current economic climate, this is quite common.
    Unethical, but common.

    You have the option of getting a sign on bonus, to increase the amount of salary.

    Remember that the recruiter is not your advocate, they are the advocate for the company that they are employed. You make more, and they get more in commission. That is their incentive, and nothing else.

  17. Anonymous

    If you would be leaving another job to take this job, then definitely counteroffer at what you want to be making. If you are currently unemployed and don't have any other job offers, then maybe still counteroffer at the midpoint of the original band or less, but keep in mind that this is a huge red flag and the company is probably going to screw you over on other things so you might want to keep looking in the meantime. Good luck!

  18. Anonymous

    The fact that they would lower your offer instead of giving the other person a raise says a LOT about the company. I don't think they can really claim pay equity when, to them, that means underpaying everyone. They should be raising everyone's salaries to keep up with the current market. Huge red flag!!

Fairygodboss VIP
Achieve your career goals.
Be part of the largest online career community for women to find jobs, advice, and support — for free.
Fairygodboss members