I have a wonderful coworker (Supervisor) that I have worked with for 2 years.

I have a wonderful coworker (Supervisor) that I have worked with for 2 years. She is a hard worker, never calls in and always goes above and beyond to get the job done. She has amazing performance reviews and has never had an issue with management or other employees.

Our company requires a background check before an employee can start. Apparently our old General Manager did not process her background check and just allowed her to start. She had a run in with the law in 2011 and was convicted in 2018. Once she was allowed to work she assumed the company didn't care about the conviction. There was not a question asking "have you ever been convicted of a felony", so she did not falsify any information. She turned her paperwork in like she was supposed to.

Fast-forward to the current day.... the company realized that her background was never processed and she is now awaiting the results. Her fear is that the background check could cause her to lose her job.

Isn't it the companies responsibility to make sure all of the employees background checks are processed? Should the burden fall back on the employee? ANY advice for her would be helpful.

Why women love us:

  • Daily articles on career topics
  • Jobs at companies dedicated to hiring more women
  • Advice and support from an authentic community
  • Events that help you level up in your career
  • Free membership, always

Share your insight

Join an authentic community that helps women support each other at work. Share your professional experience or ask for advice — you can even post anonymously.

24 Comments

Join the conversation
  1. Anonymous

    I had that happen with a credit check. They started me part-time, then added another site so I could become full-time. Then they promoted me and put me on salary. About a year after my promotion, they realized they never ran my credit, so I had to sign a form (they didn't make it seem like I had a choice) that permitted them to do it. Since I was processing and acknowledging memorial donations, they didn't like that I had such a bad score, so they took that duty away from me. I was laid off a few months later, and I always wondered if that had anything to do with it.

    It all depends on whether or not her conviction creates a liability with her position. If so, they may not have a choice. If she has performed well and it is not a liability, they may temporarily put her on a performance plan to make sure for "image" reasons. It may help to look into expungement programs (depending on your state) that can remove the conviction from most background checks. Where I live, if there has been no further law enforcement contact since the sentence for a [specific] number of years (depending on the offense). Just a note, drug offenses in a medical office or a violent felony when working with children or other vulnerable populations is generally grounds for dismissal, and she wouldn't have been hired in the first place.

    A conviction is not always an immediate "no," even when you are being hired. It depends if the sentence is contrary to the position, and the timing is essential. If she has not had any further issues, and it's been since 2018, it should only be a problem if it creates a liability for the company.

  2. Anonymous

    They will not put her on a performance plan. Her conviction has zero to do with her job performance.

  3. Anne Krook

    Fortunately she now has a track record with the company, and given how hard it is to hire good people, they are less likely to fire her as a result of whatever is on there. To the extent that she can address whatever she gets asked about it and point out how she has changed her life and work (which from your description it seems that she has), she could be fine. Many other factors are at play beyond her or your knowledge as well: has the person who gets the results had a family member in a similar situation so they are more sympathetic? have they recently tired to hire someone and had a hard time? etc.

  4. G C Hesse

    There's a time limit on background checks....like how far back are the looking.

    Also it is now considered illegal to ask that question. Federal Government mandated that back in 2015. It is not supposed to be on any application.

  5. Anonymous

    It is not illegal to ask about a criminal conviction. Some states won't allow you to let that be a deciding factor, but they can ask.

  6. Anonymous

    That is absolutely not true. It's not illegal at all to ask, and there is no statute of limitations on how far back you can look.

    There are also no laws prohibiting employers from refusing to hire for any reason whatsoever EXCEPT those that are mandated by anti-discrimination laws. There are guidelines, but no mandates.

  7. Anonymous

    Yes, it is the company's responsibility to conduct background checks. Most background checks go back 7 years. In her favor is that she already has the job and is doing well. The employer must conduct an individualized assessment as to whether the conviction has a "direct and adverse relationship" with the specific job duties of the position. At a minimum, the employer must consider the following:

    the nature and severity of the offense

    how long it's been since the applicant committed the offense and served his or her sentence, and

    the nature of the job the applicant is applying for.

    For example, suppose an applicant has a conviction related to prescription drug abuse from five years ago, but has completed rehab and been sober since. Depending on the circumstances, the conviction might be a reason to deny employment for a position at a pharmacy but not for a position at a call center.

    Providing Notice and an Opportunity to Respond

    If, after completing this inquiry, the employer decides not to hire the applicant, the employer must provide the applicant with a written notice of its decision. The notice must:

    specify the conviction that was the basis for the decision

    provide a copy of the conviction history report, if the employer has one, and

    explain the applicant's right to respond with favorable evidence by a certain deadline.

    I think she'll be fine. Hope this helps.

  8. Maggie Stone

    Hopefully, this won’t stand in her way. This is on the company, not her. She did not withhold or falsify any info.

  9. Afo Ogbeyalu Kalu

    I applaud your advocacy for your Supervisor!
    That being stated, it is not a done-deal that she'd be penalized for the oversight, especially if the oversight is as you posted.

    I would advise your Supervisor to begin to draft a letter or rebuttal to an assumed recinding of her current position, highlighting her contributions, successes, and that she did not mis-state any information on her initial job application.

    Depending on the severity of the felony conviction, it may not impact her position. In fact, many companies have been incentivized by the government and non-profits to employ rehabilitated individuals in the form of grants and subsidized salaries. Hope is not lost! Best of luck??

  10. Anonymous

    There is no burden on either side but, if you are in a fair chance state she may be okay. If there is a way for her to speak openly about the situation being a well loved and highly productive employee the company should be willing to listen. Having a record does not automatically mean you lose your job. Perhaps you could privately ask HR/legal about the what ifs using scenarios that don't disclose her situation specifically if she is uncomfortable with doing this herself. The fact that she disclosed it and did not hide it is better, if she lied on the documentation then it could be an issue. Also the years are past 7 back so it also depends on how long the company asks the 3rd party to go back and record check. Usually in my experience (I work in HR/legal) it is only 7 years going back.

  11. Anonymous

    First priority is the safety of employees, second to be fair and consistent with processes, then all job offers are contingent upon a passed background check. Now, saying this, whoever processed them to be hired and created that should be the employee who would have known that they could start the process as they would have gotten a passed background check notice. Multiple errors for sure. Now , they’ve been working for 2 years? I’d think legal would get involved at the company to address this mess. If theft or felony , that makes it tougher. All companies set their own threshold of what they will allow to be hired with convictions. Hopefully they’ve been an exceptional coworker and they’ve stayed clear of the law.

  12. Anonymous

    A conviction does not have to be for a violent act. Obviously she did her time (paid her debt to society) and is entitled to having her life back and to move on. The only times that a prior felony would be a hindrance to a job would be something like a child molester wanting to work in day care or an accountant who embezzled wanting to work in a bank type thing. Yes, the employer should have done their due diligence and yes they need to follow through now that they have caught the oversight, but that doesn’t mean she is out of a job.

    Hopefully they will keep her record to themselves, as they should, tell her she has been a good employee and they are happy with her performance and move on.

    I work in a state agency, we have many employees who were convicted of something, doesn’t mean they aren’t good employees and friends. Just means they made a mistake.

  13. Lorraine Herrera

    If you are in US, this is the law that applies in this case. Is a case by case basis, she can read it and see if in any way they are violating the law. https://www.eeoc.gov/arrestandconviction

  14. Anonymous

    Background checks that come back with something on them don't necessarily mean a person won't be hired. Sometime it's just certain crimes that will disqualify a person from working for a particular company. I know someone that just got hired and has a criminal past but the crime didn't disqualify him.

  15. Anonymous

    The good news is she has a positive track record established. This is an entirely discriminatory practice (surprise!). BAN THE BOX.

  16. rgstaffing@bellsouth.net

    If she has a felony arrest on her record that will be a big problem.

  17. Anonymous

    She needs to lawyer up ASAP. Unfortunate that she will have to foot the costs, and this will be expensive. The company did not complete their due diligence. That is the company's negligence not hers. I hope it work out.

  18. Cynthia Beckles

    It will be worth every penny for her to secure a good Employment Attorney.

  19. Anonymous

    I think your advice is accurate but I wouldn't jump the gun and hire an attorney. Unless the really is a problem and something did defend.. We might all be pleasantly surprised and find out that everything has passed through

  20. Anonymous

    My last company was acquired by a larger corporation. For some reason, the HR records were not combined. As part of my hiring process at this company, this was issue. my references were checked, I was contacted to explain the discrepancy. I was able to provide the information and contact information for the original company. The discrepancy was talked about and not an automatic deal breaker.

  21. Anonymous

    I would also suggest she contact the local legal aid society. Depending on her conviction, she may be able to get it expunged or at least sealed.

    I am NOT an attorney, so my only advice is to seek out the local legal aid society - they can offer free advice to her and represent her if they feel she has had her rights violated.

  22. BN

    Many states have laws around criminal charges but based on pre-offer, commonly known as Ban The Box laws. Post hire, fewer states offer job protection for those convicted on criminal charges. In every case it is going to depend on what she was convicted of and what her role is. For example someone convicted of embezzlement and working for a finance company, they would terminate based on company and client financial risk. Someone working with a vulnerable population, on the circumstances of the conviction, may not be allowed to work if there was a physical assault.

  23. Anonymous

    Once she was allowed to work... What does that mean?I am restating what you said above....

  24. Anonymous

    Thank you all for your advice!! My Supervisor was able to keep her job.

Fairygodboss VIP
Achieve your career goals.
Be part of the largest online career community for women to find jobs, advice, and support — for free.
Fairygodboss members