I was a fully remote employee prior to my maternity leave.

I was a fully remote employee prior to my maternity leave. I returned at the end of January. 2 weeks ago, my boss asked that I return to office full time. Does this count as a “change to terms of employment”? Prior to my leave, I asked if my remote status would be an issue when I returned and she assured mr it wouldn’t be. If I had known, I would have started looking for a new job while on leave.

Why women love us:

  • Daily articles on career topics
  • Jobs at companies dedicated to hiring more women
  • Advice and support from an authentic community
  • Events that help you level up in your career
  • Free membership, always

Share your insight

Join an authentic community that helps women support each other at work. Share your professional experience or ask for advice — you can even post anonymously.

17 Comments

Join the conversation
  1. Anonymous

    I mean in all fairness, it wasn't an issue when you returned. Two months later, it is.

    Is everyone being required to return to the office full time? I'm just wondering if this is an across the board edict from the top down or whether it's just you specifically.

  2. Anonymous

    The official return to office was in April 2022, well before my leave. This is just for me right now.

  3. Zayda Hernandez

    When you are on leave technically you are being released from your position. FMLA requires that the employer return you to a position equivalent to the one you held not the same one. Since your remote status was approved I suspect you lost that once you left on leave. Try approaching HR and see if you can be approved again for remote status. But at this point they are not obligated to do so.

  4. Anonymous

    Was that documents in writing prior to your leave?

  5. Anonymous

    Did your job you were hired into list it as remote? They have every right to expect workers to return to the office. Now, in saying that, I see that hybrid will be the new norm. I think being flexible with that is important. If you weren't hired as a remote worker but transitioned to remote due to Covid - that allowed you to keep working and earning a paycheck. It was not meant to be forever. That entitlement is not warranted. IF you were hired into a remote worker position, you should lean into that for your side in addressing. It's a very common conversation in the workplace of bringing people back in, preparation is on the employee side of responsibilities. I'm sure they'd provide enough time to prepare for you. The amount of money we all have saved with remote is amazing! Even the daycare costs alone!! I understand your pov, and if you're not a remotely hired employee, you may end of leaving or you may see the company to compromise after feedback to hybrid. Good luck, I know it's a frustrating time.

  6. Annetta Moses

    In general, companies can decide where positions are located. In you want a position to be remote, you would need to be hired into a remote position and “read the fine print in the hiring contract” have a guarantee that the position would be remote for a specific period of time.

    Before, COVID, my company had a process to apply for HR approval to work remotely. However, once a position was defined as remote, the “fine print” said the position could be converted back to on site depending on business needs.

    Note that companies have moved entire business units and headquarters from one state to another. These companies didn’t consult the employees if they wanted to move. The employees who wanted their job could move to the new state or look for a new job in the old state.

  7. Anonymous

    Yes, totally understand. My question is more so if this goes against FMLA protections.

  8. Anonymous

    What does this have to do with FMLA? The only time FMLA applies is when you're out on an acceptable medical reason and the only thing it ensures is that you can come back to an equivalent position after being gone for up to 12 weeks. Anything beyond that is a company decision/policy, not a law.

  9. Anonymous

    When were you hired? If you were in an onsite position before COVID, which became fully remote because of COVID, those jobs are largely transitioning to hybrid or back to onsite. This is true for positions posted as "fully remote" when hiring during COVID (basically for the past three years). As others have said, you can transition, negotiate for hybrid, or look for another job. The culture of the requirement for onsite work has changed significantly in the past three years, so, as Annetta stated below, companies routinely change positions and locations without asking for the employees' permission. If your company cannot make some compromise, your only choices are to go back to work in the office or find another job.

  10. Anonymous

    Was your fully remote status part of the pandemic-related shift to home folks went through, and now your office (not just you) is returning? In other words, were you hired as fully remote with no office-based expectations? If not, this wouldn't be a change in work status. Your post indicates that your boss has asked you to "return" to the office full-time, suggesting that you were office-based at one point.

  11. Anonymous

    I was hired during the pandemic when all were remote; however, when the return to office happened, we were allowed to request fully remote status and I did, and it was approved. HR has me as a fully remote employee, working in my home state vs the state my office is in, my payroll taxes, leave benefits were based on my home state. I don’t have a desk assignment at the office or anything, so it is my official designation.

  12. Ashley D

    It does sound like a change in terms then, it’s unreasonable that they had you officially as a remote employee and then have just decided they want you in the office.

  13. Anonymous

    Your company may change its requirements and chalk it up to business strategy and demands. Most companies try and keep their top performers happy so they don't lose them. I would try and find a mutually acceptable compromise.

  14. Anonymous

    This does not change terms of employment, I would negotiate a hybrid work environment, and provide your reasonings. If they are adamant about 100% in office then you have a choice to make it work or start searching for a new job.

  15. Crystal Howell

    I feel for you, I learned the hard way too!

    You must get everything in writing, we no longer live in the Leave it to Beaver, where your word meant something.

  16. Ashley D

    I might contact a lawyer, seems like there is some unfairness in this situation but a lawyer would be able to better tell you if you have a case.

  17. Anonymous

    Lawyering up will help get to the root of this. If the company has made everyone come back then there is no choice. When you are on leave they are not responsible for letting you know of upcoming changes.

Fairygodboss VIP
Achieve your career goals.
Be part of the largest online career community for women to find jobs, advice, and support — for free.
Fairygodboss members