I'm not sure about the specifics of the role, but that does sound low.
I know that Nationwide Insurance increased their minimum wage to $21/hr and the American Family Insurance group increased theirs to $23/hr. Both are remote friendly. My experience is on the P and C side, but a lot of the major P and C carriers also have life/group products. (Edited because FGB hates the ampersand)
Additionally, both Nationwide and AmFam are great places to work as a woman. They have a strong representation of women in all levels of leadership, including technical/analytical departments, promote flexibility, and have excellent benefits for parents. Health insurance is still expensive (like everywhere), but their other policies are very family-friendly. I worked for Nationwide for 13 years, so speaking from experience. I know several people at AmFam (Homesite specifically), and they love it. I am calling out these two specifically because I could remember off the top of my head that they had high minimum wages.
You can't really stop recruiters from low-balling any more than they can stop candidates from expecting to be paid a competitive wage. Both Nationwide and AmFam's minimum wages are easily googled and could provide a counterpoint to a given role's specific salary. (It looks like USAA is also at $21)
I can't say if you should pass on the above role or not, but that salary is less than what three major carriers would pay for zero experience in their lowest paying job families. Maybe they aren't factoring in your experience, or maybe they churn through people at rate that it doesn't actually matter how much experience a person has. That would be my thought process.
Good luck!
Share your insight
Join an authentic community that helps women support each other at work. Share your professional experience or ask for advice — you can even post anonymously.
33 Comments
Join the conversation