I interviewed with essentially the same company twice. Getting requested to schedule 2nd rounds.

I interviewed with essentially the same company twice. Getting requested to schedule 2nd rounds.

About a week ago I had initial screening calls with a recruiter from the parent company, and the VP of Operations with one of their subsidiaries. The parent company has reached out to me from several sources, but I only interacted with the two. On each call, the interviewer made it clear that while the companies were related, they operated separately. Both calls went well, and the interviewers followed up with a note that they'd be getting back to me later.

This week, I received a call from the parent company recruiter for second round interviews, but in the message, they mentioned the position would be for the subsidiary. I am just wondering if I should be transparent with the recruiter and tell them I'm working with the VP on a position with them already?

My concern is that I told the recruiter I was flexible in offering and position, however I told the VP that I was a bit more rigid. While this sounds like a company that doesn't have it together, I do get how there may be some disconnect, so I am not discouraged and would really like to work for them. Honestly I would prefer a second round with the VP instead of the recruiter, because the recruiter is just looking to fill the open position while the VP is actively working on needs and best fit and already described what they 'd be interested in having me take on.

I haven't yet heard back from the VP, so not sure how to move forward. Any advice?

Some clarifiers: On pay, the recruiter did tell me the position was hourly, just about what I'm making now, and would require in office - where I would potentially have to relocate back to my hometown. My stated number to the VP was roughly 20k more than I currently make and with a preference for remote which they said was something they'd already had in place and could accommodate.

Why women love us:

  • Daily articles on career topics
  • Jobs at companies dedicated to hiring more women
  • Advice and support from an authentic community
  • Events that help you level up in your career
  • Free membership, always

Share your insight

Join an authentic community that helps women support each other at work. Share your professional experience or ask for advice — you can even post anonymously.

6 Comments

Join the conversation
  1. Anonymous

    Say nothing and just keep things moving forward on both sides...TBH, right now all you really have is a lot of talk with no real job offer.

  2. Rae Kennedy

    Thanks, you're right. Sometimes the best solution really is the simplest one.

  3. Anonymous

    Is the recruiter an in house recruiter? If they are they should see the details on any applications through the applicant tracking system (ATS). If they are an external 3rd party recruiter then leave it be. I would just go to your interviews, be open to any and all conversations and don't equate the VP as having more clout on the other side. Ask for the job in each interview and ask for feedback and show interest. You can only accept a position there if they offer one to you and that is the goal you should focus on. Details aside go all in to get an offer either way.

  4. Anonymous

    Better to check with the recruiter and inform them in case they are not aware. They may have different budgets and really two different teams. In that case, you may be given a choice, if selected.

  5. Dawn Cross

    Is it possible the VP is working through the recruiter for formality sake?

  6. Anonymous

    Right now things are in flux and they (both VP and recruiter) have narrowed their initial interest to upwards to 20 candidates. I would not adjust or clarify things just yet. I would wait until 2nd and third rounds to be more specific on details.

Browse recent posts

Fairygodboss VIP
Achieve your career goals.
Be part of the largest online career community for women to find jobs, advice, and support — for free.
Fairygodboss members