I'm sorry you're having a hard time in your job search - it's a tough market out there.
There is no "making it through" or "getting past the ATS". The goal is to make it INTO the ATS. So you can be considered as a candidate. I can't interview someone who has not applied.
I have experience with 7 or 8 different ATS and with different configurations of those systems.
Here's what happens (on all the systems I've ever used) when a new candidate applies to one of my open requisitions:
I click on their name in the list of new applicants for that requisition. Their resume has not been ranked. It has not been sorted for keywords. It has not been "scored". It has not been filtered.
There typically is no sorting involved with the application process – which is where keywords come in.
I click "download resume". It downloads in whatever format - Word doc or PDF - the candidate uploaded it. I look at their resume. With my eyeballs. Every one.
There's no need for me to search by keywords for new applicants because you're sitting right there in the list of new applicants.
There really are no "ATS scores" that are actually used to make decisions on candidates - even on systems that do score resumes, recruiters generally do not pay any attention to them because they are notoriously bad at it.
The ATS does not "put through candidates" - good or otherwise. The ATS is basically an electronic filing cabinet. It's where we move candidates through different steps in the process, schedule interviews, generate offer letters from.
Many ATS are notoriously bad at "parsing" the resume. When I was in my own last job search, I would groan every time I was taken to a Taleo, iCIMS or Workday ATS because I knew I was going to have to copy and paste every company name, every job title and every experience section when it screwed up the parsing. That has nothing to do with me being able to see your resume attachment nor does it have anything to do with your candidacy. The parsing is for your profile - I view your resume from the document you attached, not the profile.
You may have been an 80% match, but in this very competitive market, there were likely candidates that were just a bit better match.
If you are in the US, there is no system - no matter how much resume writers and job coaches want you to believe it - that make decisions about whether candidates are moved forward in the process.
There is not such thing as an "ATS compliant" resume - no matter how much someone wants to charge you $1,000 for one.
I know most candidates don't seem to want to hear this, but when they're being rejected, they're being rejected by a human. I'm the bot.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Good luck!!
Share your insight
Join an authentic community that helps women support each other at work. Share your professional experience or ask for advice — you can even post anonymously.
44 Comments
Join the conversation