Everyone's metrics sent to everyone - wtf?

Everyone's metrics sent to everyone - wtf? I've since moved on from the contract where this happened but it's still bothering me even a couple months later. During this job we had metrics tracking how many documents we worked through every day. I'm not really upset that there were metrics so much as EVERYONE'S metrics were all sent together in the same email and even had highlighting so everyone could VERY EASILY see who did and did not meet targets.

I REALLY didn't like that, but never said anything about, though it really badly impacted my performance, being constantly nervous about that email every day. I absolutely hated it and sort of wanted to know other people's thoughts and opinions. I'm pretty certain it's not normal - I've never had any job (and I've done a lot of contract work) that so blatantly like lined it all up and even highlighted and color-coded peoples performance metrics to everyone, but it felt like a violation, to me kinda...

Like I would have been willing to receive information on my metrics, literally any other way. It felt like a really awful way to do this sort of thing and regardless of how I performed, I felt REALLY exposed and like this information wasn't anyone's business besides my own and my supervisors, if I wasn't meeting target/needed help. There was even one day when I tried to google if that's even ok to do because yeah... it just felt sooo gross and distressing, thoughtless and unhelpful.

Why women love us:

  • Daily articles on career topics
  • Jobs at companies dedicated to hiring more women
  • Advice and support from an authentic community
  • Events that help you level up in your career
  • Free membership, always

Share your insight

Join an authentic community that helps women support each other at work. Share your professional experience or ask for advice — you can even post anonymously.

10 Comments

Join the conversation
  1. Anonymous

    Would you have had the same opinion if your performance on this contract were better? I’m a bit surprised by your dismay, this is basic benchmarking. You and your colleagues are being paid to generate a work product, not leisurely make your way through the day. Your employer wants the highest output possible from this contract and they communicated / tracked this through regular reports. We’re all evaluated every day in our jobs to make sure we’re providing sustained value to the organization that’s signing our paycheck. Frankly, what you’re describing doesn’t seem too off base.

  2. Kathryn Montbriand

    Performance tracking and sharing is pretty common among roles that have easily trackable metrics and SLAs attached to them. I've seen this in sales or service organizations - the desire is to motivate everyone to meet the target.

    I'd encourage you to spend some time thinking about what is at the root of your discomfort. Do you need a collaborate vs. competitive environment in order to thrive? Are you seeking a place that helps you grow or leverages a different type of motivation structure?

    It sounds like there was a mismatch between what you need and what this previous employer offered. Getting to the core of what matters most to you in an employer / culture will help you narrow in on opportunities that are a better fit in the future. Cheers!

  3. Anonymous

    I have to agree with the other poster, this is pretty basic benchmarking and not uncommon. I have managed teams and we had a balanced score card that showed metrics of each team, individual, region, etc.. I helps employees know how to improve before having to address productivity and helps managers monitor performance. I get that you may not like it, I'm sure no one does but it's part of gathering metrics.

  4. Julie Reeves

    The issue is sounds like this group simply posting metrics for the group as the only way to set performance goals and help employees achieve those goals

    You don’t lead individuals by simply posting kpi’s to a group

  5. Anonymous

    I'm sorry but I did not get that impression at all. She never said that they were simply posting metrics as the only way to set performance goals. She said they posted them, which is common practice, and though it really bothered her, she never said anything. I would imagine if she spoke to her manager about it making her uncomfortable it would have been addressed. That's not to say they would have stopped posting metrics but it could have been discussed. I also do not think the basis of publishing metrics is to make someone uncomfortable, but I do think it is to motivate someone to do better in their role. If there is a reason behind poor metrics, the employee (or manager, if they are a good one - I met with my team to review metrics monthly and once a week individually) should connect to to see how the employee can be supported to be able to make their goals.

  6. Joan Williams, Senior Talent Acquisition Specialist

    I agree with the other commenters - this is basic benchmarking.

    But this happened at a company that you haven't worked at for months - why are you still chewing on this.

    Every company has the right to set up their reporting/metrics the way they see fit. This company's process didn't align with what you were comfortable with so you left. I highly recommend you now move on.

  7. Anonymous

    Maybe it's just the wrong sort of environment for me.
    I don’t have to do a lot of soul-searching either to figure out why it bothers me – I’m an anxious person that tends to over-fixate on the fear that other people who know nothing about me, are judging me with incomplete information.

    Like I said, it's not so much that performance is tracked, as it is that everyone's performance is publicly tracked in a way that everyone can pair my full name with my exact numbers every single day and it’s emailed out first thing in the morning, so it’s the first thing we all look at, at the start of shift. Days that I performed better, yes, it did still bother me a lot. Regardless of how I perform, I don't like that kind of attention, good or bad (And yes, attention – in meetings, metrics would be pulled up and presented and they would talk about specific people or hold people after the meeting – it felt really public for a job mainly performed on a very individual level) I, personally, just want to do my work and have a number to say "ok, how can I do better" or "ok, looks like I'm getting the hang of it."

    I don't think tracking metrics is bad or useless to me. I do find motivation in having a target to hit. I’ve even been in other work environments where, on a surface level, one might say that metrics were even more on display: I had a processing job a few years ago where we would track numbers on a laminated sheet, marking down, in dry erase, how many documents we processed at the end of every hour, and hang them up on the corner of our desk in the isle for supervisors to come down the line every couple hours and check them off. That didn’t bother me so much because I knew almost nobody was stopping and looking at other people’s sheets – like it was public but it felt different, in a way that’s a bit hard to articulate. I guess it also helps that in the older job, the whole department felt very warm and friendly, whereas the more recent assignment felt a bit too short and siloed off for people to get to know one another.

    In the more recent job, it was hard to NOT know everyone else’s numbers if you wanted to know your own. It’s still bothering me because I guess more than anything, I don’t know how to prepare myself for something like that going forward. If I wanted to avoid an environment like that, how would I go about doing that? If it was unavoidable, and it came up in, say, my next assignment, what could I do to alleviate some of that stress for myself? It upset me enough to be afraid of encountering it again in the future. If it was something that I would just need to talk to a supervisor about it, how would I go about doing that without like… getting super anxious trying to talk about it?

    Like there’s times when something upsets me, that it’s hard to figure out how to communicate AND keep my emotions in check so I can remain professional. I mean saying it like that makes it sound like I’m asking for therapy, but I know I couldn’t get that in a public forum and I have a therapist anyway – I just – urgh… it just felt like the perfect storm, where all the pieces fell in just the wrong way, to make it sort of a miserable job, where I felt like I maintained a high level of anxiety almost all day every day.

  8. Anonymous

    I worked for a company that did this across the board. Metrics were actually uploaded to company intranet. It's not that uncommon to be transparent with metrics. With that said that's not the type of work I'd like to do.

  9. Karen Bernal 'student'

    What deeply offends me is when I'm told that I have no choice but to make up for others' low metrics and not be compensated for doing so.

    Don't worry about your low metrics. The company is not stupid enough to let people go for not doing enough work.

  10. Karen Bernal 'student'

    When you see someone with high metrics, pay them to do your work for you, because the company won't pay them extra to do your work for you.

Fairygodboss VIP
Achieve your career goals.
Be part of the largest online career community for women to find jobs, advice, and support — for free.
Fairygodboss members