I'm not even going to speak to the casual attire part, as I could honestly not care less what people are wearing unless a customer is involved. I used to work remotely before Zoom/Teams was such a thing, and we would frequently only be speaking on an audio-only conference line with no clue what people even looked like. I wish we could go back to that, to an extent, as they were quicker, more to the point, and scheduled far less often. Also, audio quality was almost never an issue, and I don't recall anyone ever thinking they were unmuted/muted when they were not. All told, far lest wasted time.
It sounds like this is more of a meeting/personnel management problem than a Zoom problem. Many companies or managers seem to have decided that they need frequent remote synchronous sessions because they can't tell what their people are doing while they're not physically present in the office, so they overschedule these types of meetings, and people end up with no bandwidth left.
Your team lead probably shows up late and unprepared because he came straight from another meeting that went over, and because they only have to log off of one session and into another, nobody has any respect for people's time. He's probably been in these types of things all day long, so no, he's not had time to prepare or even look at the agenda, assuming anyone took the time to prepare one (unlikely).
Your colleagues are likely doing work during the meeting because a) that's the only way to make sure it gets done, as they are also overscheduled, and b) the meeting lacks structure and purpose, and they realize they don't even need to pay attention unless they are called upon to speak.
To be fair, this trend of wasted meetings was begun long before Zoom and the pandemic, but it's been spiraling downhill since then. With some people returning to in-person work, I hope it will get better, but I'm not holding my breath.
Change, in this case, will usually have to come from the top, but often people are too used to this to even see a problem. The meeting has become how they manage, and they have come to see "going to a meeting" as some kind of proof that they got something done, so it can be difficult to shake. I'd recommend, if your HR has an anonymous suggestion box, that you write a brief summary of what you're seeing and ask if they can institute some basic rules about meeting frequency and time that would help alleviate the issue.
Easy starter rules:
1) never schedule a meeting without an agenda.
2) no internal meetings between 8-10 or 3:30-5.
3) no meetings that default to 30 or 60 minutes; stick to 20 and 45.
4) even, if you can swing it, designate a specific day of the week as a no-meeting day.
It can help, if you're in charge of scheduling some things, if you start with the very meetings you set up. Productivity and happiness will rise; if HR needs some kind of justification, that's a given. Good luck!
Share your insight
Join an authentic community that helps women support each other at work. Share your professional experience or ask for advice — you can even post anonymously.
100 Comments
Join the conversation