PHI is tricky to determine in this case.
To be honest, everyone already knows each other’s names, so releasing that information may not be a violation (note: not an attorney). If no other additional information was released with it - there is nothing that someone couldn’t argue wouldn’t be in a company directory.
As for the claim information, PHI would say that it was released in aggregate form, not individually. As in - Mary had $8k in medical claims, $1200 in vision and $4k in dental. If nothing was broken down and everyone in the org was on there, it could be argued that it was released for transparency or to show where health insurance money is going (that the company is paying for, perhaps if they are talking about an increase in the next year).
Questions:
Is it an employee funded plan?
how much do employees pay vs the company?
Is it around enrollment time so the org is trying to show how/why costs might be increasing?
I am not saying this was the best course of action, just saying that it doesn’t sound like releasing numbers without any actual information on claims violates HIPAA (your company os not a medical provider) or has released PHI.
I am still curious about their reasoning. I am sure it leaves a bad taste in quite a few employees’ mouths, just like it has for you.
Share your insight
Join an authentic community that helps women support each other at work. Share your professional experience or ask for advice — you can even post anonymously.
48 Comments
Join the conversation