I've been on the other side of the hiring table many times, and it's important to know that if a company is extending an offer to you, they likely had a tough time deciding between you and the top candidate and they believe you are capable of performing in the role – otherwise, you wouldn't be receiving an offer.
As difficult as this is to not take personally, it's not about their personal feelings regarding your personality/abilities, but about your fit at their company, in this position.
I recently interviewed for a role with a great startup with an incredibly intense interview process (10 interviews, including a 1.5-hour presentation, over the course of a week). They were obviously deeply invested in me as a candidate and wanted to find a strong fit for what was an executive leadership role.
At the eleventh hour, a candidate applied with10+ years of industry-specific experience and the CEO was transparent with me that this candidate was a better fit for that reason. She was sincere and apologetic about the "frustrating" situation, and I completely understand her perspective.
While I had other offers on the table, this company was my first choice at the time, and I would have accepted their offer if the first candidate backed out because they were transparent and empathetic.
If the company has blundered the interview process across the board, I would be more wary of their internal processes and the role in general. If you're comfortable doing so, you can ask for a 30-minute follow-up with the supervisor to ensure you fully understand the role and expectations and ask whether there are any skillsets or professional development you can undertake in preparation for the role.
Share your insight
Join an authentic community that helps women support each other at work. Share your professional experience or ask for advice — you can even post anonymously.
68 Comments
Join the conversation