principal security architect Job Reviews

Women who are principal security architects have an overall job satisfaction level of 2, 0% of them believe there is gender equality in their firms, and make an average salary range of >$150k.

Review User Image
Anonymous - 5821 Microsoft Principal Security Architect, Information Security & Risk Management
Send Message 1
January 1970

Microsoft's documented policies that encourage equal treatment for all employees are quite good; however, the individual experience one can expect is extraordinarily dependent on one's manager. I've been a full-time employee for over a decade, and have more than twenty years' history working for Microsoft (I worked as a contractor off and on prior to joining as a full-time employee). In the years during which I had managers who were capable and objective (and even in some years when I had managers who were not very capable but were at least objective), I was always a top performer in every team in which I worked. I got a new manager this year and was suddenly given a "zero rewards" [no bonus] review that was attributed not to my contributions (or lack thereof), but to my PERSONALITY. Not only was there absolutely no supporting evidence given for the assertion, but it was demonstrably false had my manager actually talked to ANYBODY with whom I work- across the company, not just in my own team. Moreover, despite getting no bonuses from this manager, he was forced to give me a raise of >$10,000 because that's how much less I was paid than others with the same job title in my organization. In the past six months, five of my male teammates have told me that they believe my current manager has "issues" with and is "threatened by" women and that I'd be treated very differently if I were male- these were unsolicited statements each of them made after witnessing various of my manager's actions. My manager's manager's solution to a top performer suddenly being given a review and a directive to "get out" was to tell me they do want to keep me in the organization, but he has continued to keep me reporting to the manager who has admitted that he does not like me and who has given me an extraordinarily biased review containing provably-false statements. This is despite the fact that there is a peer manager to whom I could report instead- if my manager's manager was genuinely interested in getting a well-rounded assessment of my performance, a simple way to do that would be to shift me to the other manager and see if I continued to be presented as a sub-par performer. I would have attributed this experience to a personality conflict between my new manager and myself were it not for a number of incidents (literally dozens in the last six months) in which my manager has, in writing, credited male colleagues for work I've done (and which they did not contribute to at all); has blamed me for poor work done by male colleagues (which I had no involvement in); has refused to acknowledge or act on several instances in which one of my male peers has delivered abysmal work to the point that we've had to engage legal to deal with the fallout when customers complained; and has pushed the only other woman on my team into grunt work that is so below her capabilities as to be laughable were it not for the fact that it's about to drive her out of our organization. One of the very few other women (women comprise <10% of employees) in my organization was getting chemotherapy for and was criticized for not attending meetings during the time when she was receiving it. We are losing people left and right because of poor managers (my current manager is not the first bad manager that has been added to our organization in the past few years), and his manager writes these departures off as normal, even "positive" attrition [meaning- "it's a good thing s/he left, because s/he wasn't a 'good fit', anyway"] After I received my most recent review, when I shared my experiences with a few close friends, I was shocked at the number of similar stories I heard from or about both current and former Microsoft employees. I genuinely believe that Microsoft's most senior leaders want to drive an inclusive, fair culture, but there is an ingrained culture that, if an employee receives a negative review after years of being a top performer (whether male or female), it's treated as a problem on the employee's part, not as a potential problem with the manager who delivered the poor review. The experience one has at Microsoft is incredibly dependent on whether that person's manager is an advocate or an adversary, and the system is geared towards supporting the manager, not the employee. I've seen many, many stellar people driven out of Microsoft because of this, and it is not only women to whom this happens, but in the case of it happening to women, the "justification" for the negative reviews (and worse) that they got has most often been about their supposed personality issues ["aggressive"; "abrasive"; "domineering"; "it's not what you do, it's HOW you do it"] rather than because they didn't deliver on their commitments and assignments. Microsoft is a company that WANTS to treat people fairly, but it is unfortunately structured in a way that ensures that that doesn't happen. Rumor, innuendo, and "reputation" propagated by a bad manager carries more weight than praise and kudos from dozens of peers and other teams/organizations does. This isn't sour grapes on my part- I very much want to stay at Microsoft and I actually think that outside of the "sub" organization I'm in, the larger organization of which I'm a part is somewhat better at treating women fairly, although there's definitely a "she's difficult" bias against women who are assertive, driven, and/or willing to call out problems in the organization, coupled with an incomprehensible support of male employees who underperform again and again. Had I been asked a year or two ago if women are treated fairly at Microsoft, I'd have said that we are, but that would have been based entirely on my own positive experiences up to that point. It was only when I experienced the "dark side" myself that I not only started to run across women who have had similar experiences, but who also pointed me to even more women who had, as well. For women who are considering working at Microsoft, I'd say the following: 1. Your experience is heavily dependent on your manager and your manager's manager, and those can (and will) likely change a number of times over your career at Microsoft. If you interview and don't get the strong feeling that your potential manager will be your advocate and wants to hire you not just because you're a woman (there's pressure to recruit and hire women and minorities across the company), but because your skills and capabilities are desirable to the organization, run away and look for another team to join. Don't be afraid to ask if you can speak with other women in the team/organization; if there aren't any, if they're only found in non-technical roles such as HR, marketing, etc.; or if they aren't able or willing to enthusiastically articulate how they feel about working in the team, think carefully about whether you want to join that team. And if you're somebody who wants to rise to senior levels within the company, be prepared to have to be more politically savvy and self-aggrandizing than you might normally be comfortable with. Of course, now that I've written that, I'm reminded of a female colleague who recently joined Microsoft and who was brought in at a level far below what she should have been hired at, as well as being told by her "mentor", "there's a fine line between keeping your manager informed and 'bragging'." Yes, really.

Job Satisfaction Level
12 hours
None taken
Maybe. Equal treatment is strongly dependent on the quality of the ...

Find Out

What are women saying about your company?

Click Here

Share this

Share with Friends
Share Anonymously