I went through a similar situation a few years ago and in that case, it was five rounds of interviews, including also submitting a few writing samples.
The last rounds of interviews were with senior leaders that the role would not require me to work with directly on a daily basis, if ever, yet they felt they needed to have a say.
The worse part however, was that I was informed that my rejection was largely based on the number of job changes on my resume. Yet in the five rounds of interviews, they never ONCE asked about it to at least allow me the chance to explain the circumstances. Worse, they had my resume from the moment I applied, yet still made me go through all these rounds to say that my job changes was a red flag to them.
That experience is what made me decide that I'm not doing anything more than three rounds at most for any job - initial screening call with the recruiter, interview with hiring manager and maybe final interview with the team I'd be working with. That's it.
And honestly, I think it's almost cruel on the part of some of these potential employees to put individuals, some of whom are already so stressed from their financial burden, dealing with rejection after rejection, etc. through so much only to reject them in the end. Because I don't care what any company says, most hiring managers/companies can tell fairly early if someone is a good fit for a role or not.
Share your insight
Join an authentic community that helps women support each other at work. Share your professional experience or ask for advice — you can even post anonymously.
19 Comments
Join the conversation