Article creator image

BY Fairygodboss

How to Increase Diversity and Promote More Women

Candidate pool

Photo credit: Creative Commons

TAGS: Diversity, Gender equality, Unconscious bias, Women in the workplace, Career goals

The key to promoting more women to senior management? Groom, and present at least two female candidates when it comes to putting forward a slate of candidates.

The latest research shows that when only one woman is put forth as a candidate among gender-mixed slate for an open job, she has a zero statistical probability of being hired. The culprit in this case isn’t simply gender bias. Rather, it’s also our innate bias towards maintaining the status quo (which is often in practice difficult to separate from unconscious gender bias since much of unconscious gender bias reflects social status quos).

Professors from the University of Colorado Leeds School of Business recently reported on a series of studies which placed female and male candidates in front of panels of hiring decision-makers. In their studies, they conducted experiments whereby they changed the ratio of male and female candidates in their applicant pools. What they found is that when at least two minorities or women appeared in a candidate pool of finalists (of a total slate size of 4 candidates), a woman or minority was more likely to be chosen as the final candidate. This might sound like a simple statistical truism. After all, the more women there are in a pool, the more likely a woman is to be hired, right? Well, no. The researchers found that “Each added women in a pool does not increase the probability of hiring a woman — the difference between having one and two women seems to be what matters.” They found similar results for race.

The authors of the study concluded that the reason why having one woman isn’t sufficient to change the status quo is that by being isolated, the woman is by definition a clear deviation from the norm, which can be seen as “risky” for decision-makers.

If this is true, the implication is that the well-known “Rooney” rule doesn’t go far enough. The Rooney Rule is the National Football League’s policy to put forth one minority candidate for consideration into an open leadership role. It was also recently extended to women in it’s executive ranks. It is named for Pittsburgh Steelers’ chairman Dan Rooney, who pushed the league to require that at least one minority candidate was put forward for consideration every time there was an opening for a general manager in the NFL. (Though it is often confused with affirmative action, there is nothing about the rule that gives that minority candidate any preference for selection.

There are certainly many reasons to include more women candidates when considering an important hire. Research shows that diversity is good for business, and diverse points of view are important for critical business outcomes. However, this new research shows there is no need for tokenism (which can be damaging and ineffective) if we simply want to see more women and minorities in leadership. Simply putting more than one woman or minority forward for consideration doesn’t — and shouldn’t — ensure they will be hired, but it certainly does help counteract our unconscious biases to preserve the status quo.

Fairygodboss

Fairygodboss is committed to improving the workplace and lives of women.
Join us by reviewing your employer!
 

 

Related Community Discussions

  • All women should read the amazing negotiation advice in the book, "Women in Tech: Take your Career to the Next Level" by Tarah Wheeler. I applied the advice in a recent negotiation round and got a 15% bump in salary!

    Anybody have good advice for how to request a raise that's worked?

    Great article here: "http://www.geekwire.com/2016/book-excerpt-4-negotiating-tactics/"

  • My company does not offer fertility benefits, and I'm trying to make the case to management that they should - in order to be competitive. (I'm not in HR.) Has anyone had any experience with this? Any best practices to share?

  • Trying to start a women's group at my company - has anyone done this recently and what would you suggest for best practices?

  • Hello everyone. I'm trying to attend more tech conferences in 2017 but my budget just doesn't allow for a lot of it. Every event seems to cost a lot and I'd love to attend more. Does anyone have any suggestions or ideas for what conferences to attend that are more cost-effective as well as how to get discounted tickets anywhere?

  • I believe that the common day to day issues of sexism (too small to call people out on) wear women down more than the big problems. I've also seen men (who were previously oblivious) become great advocates for women when these situations were pointed out to them.

    I am working on a virtual reality program, which share some of the common problems women run across, training the mind to recognize the problem. I'm looking for some of the common issues people run across. Personal experiences, research you've read, anything would be greatly appreciated! Either reply, or email: info@socialQVR.com

    VR has a huge potential for remapping neural training, and I want to make sure I'm drawing from the wealth of communal knowledge, not just my own experience.

Find Out

What are women saying about your company?

Click Here

Share This

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Share with Friends
  • Share Anonymously

How to Increase Diversity and Promote More Women

How to Increase Diversity and Promote More Women

The key to promoting more women to senior management? Groom, and present at least two female candidates when it comes to putting forward a slate of candid...

The key to promoting more women to senior management? Groom, and present at least two female candidates when it comes to putting forward a slate of candidates.

The latest research shows that when only one woman is put forth as a candidate among gender-mixed slate for an open job, she has a zero statistical probability of being hired. The culprit in this case isn’t simply gender bias. Rather, it’s also our innate bias towards maintaining the status quo (which is often in practice difficult to separate from unconscious gender bias since much of unconscious gender bias reflects social status quos).

Professors from the University of Colorado Leeds School of Business recently reported on a series of studies which placed female and male candidates in front of panels of hiring decision-makers. In their studies, they conducted experiments whereby they changed the ratio of male and female candidates in their applicant pools. What they found is that when at least two minorities or women appeared in a candidate pool of finalists (of a total slate size of 4 candidates), a woman or minority was more likely to be chosen as the final candidate. This might sound like a simple statistical truism. After all, the more women there are in a pool, the more likely a woman is to be hired, right? Well, no. The researchers found that “Each added women in a pool does not increase the probability of hiring a woman — the difference between having one and two women seems to be what matters.” They found similar results for race.

The authors of the study concluded that the reason why having one woman isn’t sufficient to change the status quo is that by being isolated, the woman is by definition a clear deviation from the norm, which can be seen as “risky” for decision-makers.

If this is true, the implication is that the well-known “Rooney” rule doesn’t go far enough. The Rooney Rule is the National Football League’s policy to put forth one minority candidate for consideration into an open leadership role. It was also recently extended to women in it’s executive ranks. It is named for Pittsburgh Steelers’ chairman Dan Rooney, who pushed the league to require that at least one minority candidate was put forward for consideration every time there was an opening for a general manager in the NFL. (Though it is often confused with affirmative action, there is nothing about the rule that gives that minority candidate any preference for selection.

There are certainly many reasons to include more women candidates when considering an important hire. Research shows that diversity is good for business, and diverse points of view are important for critical business outcomes. However, this new research shows there is no need for tokenism (which can be damaging and ineffective) if we simply want to see more women and minorities in leadership. Simply putting more than one woman or minority forward for consideration doesn’t — and shouldn’t — ensure they will be hired, but it certainly does help counteract our unconscious biases to preserve the status quo.

Fairygodboss

Fairygodboss is committed to improving the workplace and lives of women.
Join us by reviewing your employer!
 

 

thumbnail 1 summary